napsa student affairs administrators in higher education logo with green diamond  | NASPA Home

 

Publications  
sub_menu_cap_top
Featured Publications sub_menu_bul_off  
Books sub_menu_bul_off  
Journals sub_menu_bul_off  
Magazines sub_menu_bul_off  
Newsletters sub_menu_bul_off  
Publish sub_menu_bul_off  
Advertise sub_menu_bul_off  
Historical Documents sub_menu_bul_off  
sub_menu_cap_lwr
     
NASPA Journal
       ISSN 0027-6021 
 AIMS & SCOPE
 EDITORIAL BOARD
 ANNOUNCEMENTS
 AUTHOR GUIDELINES
cover current_issue all_issues myaccount SUBMIT ARTICLE 

bealert

Volume 42, Issue 2

AUTHOR:
Todd F. Lewis and Dennis L. Thombs

TITLE:
Perceived Risks and Normative Beliefs as Explanatory Models for College Student Alcohol Involvement: An Assessment of a Campus with Conventional Alcohol Control Policies and Enforcement Practices

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Lewis, T. F. , Thombs, D. L. (2004). Perceived Risks and Normative Beliefs as Explanatory Models for College Student Alcohol Involvement: An Assessment of a Campus with Conventional Alcohol Control Policies and Enforcement Practices. NASPA Journal, 42(2), Art. 5. Retrieved September 09, 2008, from http://publications.naspa.org/naspajournal/vol42/iss2/art5


View the article (464 K)
Notify a colleague about this paper
Get Acrobat Reader
Printing Tip: Select the option to 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog to ensure the article prints as it appears on screen.
Learn more...

ABSTRACT:
The aim of this study was to conduct a multivariate assessment of college student drinking motivations at a campus with conventional alcohol control policies and enforcement practices, including the establishment and dissemination of alcohol policies and the use of warnings to arouse fear of sanctions. Two explanatory models were compared: perceptions of risk and normative beliefs. An anonymous questionnaire was administered to 1,396 students at a large Midwestern university. Data analyses were conducted on the subsample of participants who had reported using alcohol within the past 12 months (n = 1,322). Overall, the results from a canonical correlation analysis indicated that alcohol involvement was best explained by normative beliefs about the drinking practices of one’s closest friends. Perceptions of drinking risk were less important to the explanation of alcohol involvement, and some of these measures unexpectedly had positive associations with indicators of alcohol risk behavior. The findings call into question the conventional deterrence strategies used in many university communities (i.e., belief that students who perceive there to be a low risk of receiving sanctions are those most likely to engage in alcohol related misbehavior). Furthermore, the findings suggest that effective interventions will need to impact students' normative beliefs about the drinking practices of proximal peer groups.

HOME  | MY ACCOUNT  |
Copyright ©1999-2008 Berkeley Electronic Press. All rights reserved.