napsa student affairs administrators in higher education logo with green diamond  | NASPA Home

 

Publications  
sub_menu_cap_top
Featured Publications sub_menu_bul_off  
Books sub_menu_bul_off  
Journals sub_menu_bul_off  
Magazines sub_menu_bul_off  
Newsletters sub_menu_bul_off  
Publish sub_menu_bul_off  
Advertise sub_menu_bul_off  
Historical Documents sub_menu_bul_off  
sub_menu_cap_lwr
     
NASPA Journal
       ISSN 0027-6021 
 AIMS & SCOPE
 EDITORIAL BOARD
 ANNOUNCEMENTS
 AUTHOR GUIDELINES
cover current_issue all_issues myaccount SUBMIT ARTICLE 

bealert

Volume 45, Issue 2

AUTHOR:
John P. Dugan, John L. Garland, Barbara Jacoby, and Anna Gasiorski

TITLE:
Understanding Commuter Student Self-Efficacy for Leadership: A Within-Group Analysis

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Dugan, J. P., Garland, J. L., Jacoby, B., Gasiorski, A. (2008). Understanding commuter student self-efficacy for leadership: A within-group analysis. NASPA Journal, 45(2), 282–310. Washington, DC: National Association of Student Personnel Administrators.


View the article (205 K)
Notify a colleague about this paper
Get Acrobat Reader
Printing Tip: Select the option to 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog to ensure the article prints as it appears on screen.
Learn more...

ABSTRACT:
Although students who live off-campus comprise over 85% of today’s college enrollments (Horn & Nevill, 2006), the body of research on this group is far smaller than that on residential students. Researchers regularly treat commuter students as a homogenous group and largely ignore the significant within-group differences that characterize the population (Jacoby & Garland, 2004). One way to look at the diversity within this group is to study commuter students living in the home of a parent, guardian, or other relative (i.e., dependent); and commuters who live on their own or with others (i.e., independent) (Roe Clark, 2006). This study used data from the Multi-Institutional Study of Leadership to examine within-group differences between dependent and independent commuters on the key college outcome of leadership self-efficacy (Astin & Astin, 2000). Leadership self-efficacy refers to one’s confidence in his or her capacity to lead (Murphy, 2002), and often makes the difference as to whether one actually does lead. The study also examined unique predictors of leadership efficacy for each population. Results reflected statistically significant within-group differences with independent commuters, indicating a greater sense of leadership efficacy than their dependent commuter peers. The same three environmental variables emerged as the most significant predictors of leadership efficacy for both groups: socio-cultural conversations with peers, positional leadership roles in college organizations, and employer mentoring. These were complemented by additional predictors unique to each population. This research supports the assertion of commuter student diversity and provides insights into how educational practice can best support their development of self-efficacy for leadership. Funding support for the Multi-Institutional Study of Leadership was provided by the National Clearinghouse for Leadership Programs, C. Charles Jackson Foundation, NASPA Foundation, and ACPA Educational Leadership Foundation.

HOME  | MY ACCOUNT  |
Copyright ©1999-2009 Berkeley Electronic Press. All rights reserved.